Yesterday Hesam came over to Bath, from Reading, for the day, which was cool. So we had a wonder around town (in the pissing rain), went up to the university campus, and then watched the Holland - Portugal game (in which Holland were robbed 2 - 1… bah… useless refs in this Euro tournament! They need to make some clones of the only decent referee in the world: Pierluigi Collina!. But I digress…). Oh, and there was a guest appearance by Amit, too!
Inevitably, the subject of George Dubya arose at several points during the evening. I still have trouble understanding how ANYONE can support him or his administration. They’ve ruined America in the eyes of the world (more so than ever before), their economy is in turmoil (just about a 2:1 dollar to pound exchange right now), they’ve illegally invaded and destroyed several countries (most notably, of late, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Haiti to name but three), killed thousands of foreign citizens (3,000 died in the World Trade Centre incident, however, over 6,000 citizens have died in this recent “liberation” of Iraq alone), and, from what I’ve read and observed, they’re all hopelessley corrupt. Why is “the majority” supporting him??? Brain-washing? Hypnotism? Blind faith??
Then again, I can’t complain too much as Blair was idiotic enough to support him. Bush must have made some very tempting promises to get the UK into the mess that is Iraq. I’ve never really bothered with voting before, but I’m definitely going out to the polls next time to cast my vote for someone else (though there is somewhat a lack of decent choice, at the moment… and i’m sure as hell not voting for the conservatives). I’ve also noticed that the majority of people I speak to are anti-Bush, etc. but a lot of them don’t even vote themselves, whereas every Republican I meet does vote… which I guess is how Bush got where he is in the first place. If you’re reading this and you’re living in the US, go out and vote in the upcoming elections! I’m coming to realise how important it is to vote, just to try and make a difference. So whether you agree or disagree with me… just get out there and vote!
This post was inspired by three things:
While Moore does get a little extreme at some points, and I’m not taking his word as gospel, he does raise some very pertinent points. I highly recommend you read this book… I’m also eagerly anticipating his new movie: Fahrenheit 9/11, which is released over here in the UK on July 9th, 2004!
Moore’s homepage can be found at michaelmoore.com. Oh, and for some counter-balance you could also check out Moore Lies, however I find most of their arguments to be pretty trivial.
So, if anyone who is pro-Bush, republican, and/or conservative reads this: please leave a comment and, without getting all abusive as most of you so often do, explain your point-of-view.
Oh yeah… PS: I’m back from Norway
I’m currently in the process of moving rooms, I get my degree classification tomorrow (*gulp*), and then I’ve got a familiarisation visit with the Royal Signals next Monday / Tuesday… argh. It’s a busy week.
Well, I must agree with most of what you said. I don’t think it’s completely fair to say that monkeyman Bush is completely responsible for the 6000 civilian casualties since there were quite a few car-bombings which are not necessarily a direct effect of the campaign in Iraq, but more a result of fundamentalism and opportunity. They did not dare pull that kinda crap while Saddam was still in place because he would’ve hunted them down or otherwise taken it out on their families. Obviously something the current forces cannot do under the Geneva convention (although, when you see the reports about the tortures and indecent acts performed on POWs it really makes you wonder…). But the campaign in Iraq certainly did give them opportunity and additional motives for such actions. Although I can’t see how you make your point by killing off innocent civilians. Anyway, I gotta get to the airport…leaving on a jetplane…don’t know when I’ll be back again (well I do really…)
I forgot to mention that I was highly dissappointed with our elimination from the Euro tournament. It was a disastrous day for me. I was sick, Schalken lost to Roddick at Wimbledon and Holland loses to Portugal. Bleh. Sure hope today will be better. Ciao.
It is true that civilian casualties are usually classified as ‘collateral damage’ for any military action, but my point is that the Bush administration forced the war, which led to these deaths.
Sorry you didn’t have a good day, mate
Have fun back in Houston, though!
Oh yeah I also forgot to mention that Henman, like all great English sportsmen, lost in the quarter-finals of Wimbeldon, despite his numerous quotes and interviews in which he says he thinks he’s good enough to win it. Bleh.
Whatchamacallit
Look it up in the dictionary. The usual array of life-changing things have been happening. My degree result wasn’t great, but I speak honestly when I say I don’t feel anything inside, it’s just another statistic that (like Alevels…
[...] I thought I’d share with you my experience from my last night in England. I went to visit Gareth in Bath. We watched the Holland-Portugal [...]
Go Bush! =)